Arbitrum launched a new transaction sequencing strategy proposal to add time weight to the current \”first come, first served\” strategy

On March 2, Arbitrum released a new proposal today, proposing a modified transaction sequencing strategy for the Arbitrum sequencer, adding \”time boost\” to the current first-come-first-served strategy, which will allow users to pay priority fees to obtain small advantages or \”time weight\” in multiple orders.

Interpretation of this information:

Recently, Arbitrum, an optimistic roll-up scaling solution released a new proposal that suggests the modification of the current transaction sequencing strategy. The idea behind this proposal is to add a new feature called “time boost” that will allow users to have small benefits or “time weight” when placing multiple orders using priority fees.

The current transaction sequencing strategy used in Arbitrum is a first-come-first-served strategy that sometimes results in the delay of transactions. This new proposal aims to rectify that and improve the user experience. By introducing the “time boost” feature, Arbitrum intends to provide certain benefits or advantages to users who utilize this feature.

According to the proposal, the users will be allowed to pay priority fees to obtain a certain amount of “time boost” that will be added to their transaction in the transaction pool. This means that the transaction with the highest “time boost” value will be chosen first when the sequencer is compiling the next block. In short, this gives priority to transactions that have paid for the “time boost” feature.

The “time boost” feature is a significant change that can have a ripple effect on the entire system. This is because this feature allows some degree of monetary influence on transaction priority. This means that users with more resources can pay more fees and claim the priority while the transactions of users with limited budget may end up being queued and possibly delayed. However, the proposal appears to have considered this concern and suggested a cap on the maximum amount of “time boost” allowed.

The “time boost” feature will likely benefit large-scale companies that prioritize fast transactions, such as cryptocurrency exchanges. These companies can pay large fees to ensure that their orders are given priority over others. This could lead to more adoption of Arbitrum by large companies, which could lead to increased usage, market penetration, and awareness.

In conclusion, the proposal by Arbitrum is an excellent proposal that could improve the current transaction sequencing strategy used in Arbitrum. The “time boost” feature could provide faster, more efficient, and more reliable transactions by allowing users to pay higher fees for priority transaction processing. The proposal appears to be well-considered and presents a great improvement for the system. However, the implementation of such a feature raises some concerns about the gap that this feature may create between the wealthy and the average users.