Founder of Solana Labs: The statement that voting on the chain causes network disruption is due to “pure ignorance”

On February 28, the Twitter user DBCryptoX released a controversial post about the network outage of Solana on February 25, indicating that a large number of verifier messages and online voting are blocking the network. Anatoly Yakovenko, founder and CEO of Solana Labs, responded that his remarks came from “pure ignorance” and pointed out that as part of the “single large quorum”, voting helps to provide “excellent security, high throughput and low cost” at the same time. However, Yakovenko did not completely refute the claim of DBCryptoX that 90-95% of the transactions on Solana included these verifier messages and on-chain voting, which DBCryptoX believed would help “put the system into trouble”.

Interpretation of this information:

On February 25, the Solana network experienced a network outage, which led to debates on whether the massive number of verifier messages and online voting caused the problem. A Twitter user DBCryptoX suggested that these activities were blocking the network, and the founder and CEO of Solana Labs Anatoly Yakovenko dismissed the claim as “pure ignorance.” Yakovenko argued that voting is part of the “single large quorum” that provides excellent security, high throughput, and low cost simultaneously. However, Yakovenko did not deny the allegation by DBCryptoX that 90-95% of Solana’s transactions involved verifier messages and on-chain voting, which could potentially lead to system problems.

The controversy raises several issues. First, it highlights the complexity of the Solana network, which relies heavily on verifier messages and on-chain voting to achieve its high throughput and low-cost goals. Second, it shows the importance of transparency and public scrutiny in the blockchain ecosystem, as Twitter users and other stakeholders can raise concerns and hold developers and founders accountable for their actions. Third, it points to the need for continuous monitoring and evaluation of blockchain networks to identify and resolve technical issues before they become critical.

In summary, the three keywords that best describe the controversy are complexity, transparency, and monitoring. The Solana network’s reliance on verifier messages and on-chain voting suggests that the system is highly complex and requires careful maintenance and monitoring to prevent network congestion and outages. Additionally, the disagreement between DBCryptoX and Anatoly Yakovenko underscores the need for transparency and public scrutiny in the blockchain world, where trust is essential for adoption and success. Finally, the controversy highlights the importance of ongoing monitoring and evaluation of blockchain networks to identify and resolve technical issues before they become critical.