Polygon co-creation: the next version to solve the block restructuring problem will be released around March
On February 24, Hayden Adams, the founder of Uniswap, tweeted that Polygon needed to take public action to solve its restructuring problem. Yesterday’s 157 block restructuring (5-minute history) and December’s 120 block restructuring were bad, and might also damage bridges and CEX. Perhaps it is the change of consensus algorithm? Or based on the hard bifurcation of social consensus to reduce verifiers?
Interpretation of this information:
The message is a call to action directed to Polygon regarding its recent block restructuring problems. The founder of Uniswap, Hayden Adams, took to Twitter on February 24th to express concern about the potential damage caused by these events. He cited the most recent 157 block restructuring that occurred within a 5-minute timeframe and a similar incident in December that involved 120 blocks. Adams expressed worry that these incidents could result in damage to bridges and CEX (centralized exchange).
The message raises two possible explanations for these problems. The first theory suggests that the issue may stem from a change in the consensus algorithm. Consensus algorithms determine how blockchain protocols reach agreement on valid transactions, and any changes to this process can have significant consequences. Adams implies that Polygon may have recently made changes to its consensus algorithm that are causing the block restructuring issues.
Alternatively, Adams suggests that the problem may be the result of a “hard bifurcation of social consensus.” This indicates that there may be a divide among users regarding the validity of certain blocks, which could lead to an excess of verifiers attempting to certify the same transactions. Such a scenario could overwhelm the system and result in block restructuring.
In conclusion, the message sent by Hayden Adams highlights the importance of addressing Polygon’s block restructuring problems. The incident could damage the reputation and functionality of bridges and CEX. Furthermore, it highlights the need to understand the potential implications of changes to the consensus algorithm and the importance of maintaining social consensus within the blockchain community.
This article and pictures are from the Internet and do not represent 96Coin's position. If you infringe, please contact us to delete:https://www.96coin.com/41364.html
It is strongly recommended that you study, review, analyze and verify the content independently, use the relevant data and content carefully, and bear all risks arising therefrom.