0xngmi: DefiLlama has not been hacked, so users do not need to panic
On March 20th, 0xngmi, the anonymous founder of DefiLlama, an online data analysis website, posted a message on social media to clarify that nothing on the platform had been hacked, including the DEX aggregator. Users don’t need to panic. The only problem currently is that the people who control the DefiLlama domain name and official tweets are pushing for the issuance of DefiLlama tokens, and none of the rest of the team wants to do so.
Interpretation of this information:
The message posted on social media by the anonymous founder of DefiLlama on March 20th seeks to clarify that there has been no hack on the platform or its DEX aggregator. The founder assures users of the platform that there is no need for panic. However, the tweet also sheds light on the internal dispute around the issuance of DefiLlama tokens. While the individuals in control of the platform and its social media channels are seemingly pushing for the issuance of DefiLlama tokens, the rest of the team is not on board with the idea.
The mention of DefiLlama tokens raises several questions. DefiLlama, for context, tracks the performance of different decentralized finance (DeFi) protocols and their corresponding tokens. While it is not immediately clear what DefiLlama tokens would entail, it is notable that Issuing tokens is a popular route for teams in the DeFi space to raise funds and distribute incentives. These tokens typically provide early-stage investors with preferential access to protocol fees and governance privileges.
The internal dispute within DefiLlama raises larger questions around the governance of decentralized projects. While DeFi protocols are designed to operate without centralized control, the reality is that individuals or teams have often been central to decisions made in protocols. As these protocols grow and become more popular, there may be an increasing number of disagreements over how governance should be structured and who should be making the decisions.
Overall, the message posted by the anonymous founder of DefiLlama emphasizes that there is no need for user panic around the security of the platform. At the same time, the mention of the internal dispute surrounding the issuance of DefiLlama tokens hints at larger conversations around the governance of decentralized projects.
This article and pictures are from the Internet and do not represent 96Coin's position. If you infringe, please contact us to delete:https://www.96coin.com/45146.html
It is strongly recommended that you study, review, analyze and verify the content independently, use the relevant data and content carefully, and bear all risks arising therefrom.