Lido Finance consultant: There will be many proposals to make Maker more centralized in March
On February 16, Hasu, the strategic director of Flashbots and the strategic consultant of Lido Finance, forwarded a message on social media that a series of proposals of MakerDAO next month may make the agreement more centralized, and the future agreement governance may be in the charge of more than a dozen council and committee members. Hasu said that Rune Christensen, the founder of MakerDAO, was no longer suitable to lead Maker alone. The encryption industry was in urgent need of decentralized stable currency, but there was still no reliable alternative to DAI. MKR representatives needed to be organized, and MKR holders could no longer be silent.
Interpretation of this information:
The message forwarded by Hasu, strategic director of Flashbots and strategic consultant of Lido Finance, raises concerns about the upcoming proposals of MakerDAO. According to Hasu, these proposals may lead to more centralization, with governance of the agreement being handed over to a dozen or more council and committee members. Hasu also expresses the belief that MakerDAO founder Rune Christensen is no longer suitable to lead the project alone.
This message is significant because MakerDAO is a major player in the decentralized finance (DeFi) space, with its stablecoin DAI being a popular choice for users looking for stability in the volatile cryptocurrency market. The potential centralization of MakerDAO’s governance could lead to a loss of trust among users who value decentralization and community governance.
Hasu’s call for MKR representatives to be organized and holders to speak out is a reminder of the importance of community participation in the DeFi space. Decentralization is a core principle of many DeFi projects, and it is important for users to have a say in how these projects are governed.
In summary, the three keywords that best capture the message forwarded by Hasu are centralization, governance, and community. Hasu’s message highlights concerns about the potential centralization of MakerDAO’s governance and the need for community participation in the DeFi space.
This article and pictures are from the Internet and do not represent 96Coin's position. If you infringe, please contact us to delete:https://www.96coin.com/45584.html
It is strongly recommended that you study, review, analyze and verify the content independently, use the relevant data and content carefully, and bear all risks arising therefrom.