Another organization has filed a complaint against OpenAI, requesting FTC to investigate and suspend its ChatGPT deployment

According to a report from The Verge, a US technology media, on Thursday local time, the non-profit organization Artificial Intelligence and Digital Policy Center (CAIDP) filed a complaint with the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) requesting the FTC to investigate OpenAI’s violations of consumer protection rules. The organization believes that GPT-4 is “biased, deceptive, and poses a risk to privacy and public safety.”. CAIDP believes that OpenAI violates the FTC’s guidance on artificial intelligence (AI) products and violates Section 5 of the FTC Act, which prohibits unfair and deceptive business practices. CAIDP urged FTC to investigate OpenAI and suspend commercial deployment of its large language model, including the latest version of ChatGPT.

Another organization has filed a complaint against OpenAI, requesting FTC to investigate and suspend its ChatGPT deployment

I. Introduction
– Brief explanation about OpenAI and its language model, GPT-4
– Overview of CAIDP’s complaint against OpenAI
II. Understanding biased and deceptive AI models
– Explanation on what constitutes biased and deceptive AI models
– Examples of previous instances where AI models were found to be biased and deceptive
– How AI models can pose a risk to privacy and public safety
III. FTC’s guidance on AI products
– Overview of the FTC’s guidance on how businesses should use AI models
– Explanation on how OpenAI violates the FTC’s guidance
– Discussion on how OpenAI violates Section 5 of the FTC Act, which prohibits unfair and deceptive business practices
IV. CAIDP’s complaint against OpenAI and the risks associated with GPT-4
– Details about CAIDP’s complaint against OpenAI
– Explanation on why CAIDP is concerned about the risks associated with GPT-4
– Discussion on how GPT-4 poses a threat to privacy and public safety
V. Implications of OpenAI’s behavior
– Discussion on how OpenAI’s behavior can affect the AI industry
– Ways to reduce risks associated with AI models
– Discussion on the future of AI industry
VI. Conclusion
– Recap of the main points
– Final thoughts
# According to The Verge, CAIDP Files a Complaint with FTC Urging Investigation into OpenAI’s Violations of Consumer Protection Rules
OpenAI, one of the world’s most renowned artificial intelligence research labs, is facing a complaint filed by a non-profit organization, Artificial Intelligence and Digital Policy Center (CAIDP), with the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) for violating consumer protection rules. The complaint is urging the FTC to investigate OpenAI’s “biased, deceptive, and risky” business practices surrounding its latest GPT-4 language model, especially ChatGPT.
This complaint comes amid growing concerns regarding the rising potential dangers associated with artificial intelligence, including the breach of privacy and threats to public safety. CAIDP believes that OpenAI’s GPT-4 model violates the FTC’s guidance on AI products and violates Section 5 of the FTC Act, which prohibits unfair and deceptive business practices. CAIDP has urged the FTC to investigate OpenAI and suspend commercial deployment of its large language model, including the latest version of ChatGPT.

Understanding Biased and Deceptive AI Models

AI models deemed biased or deceptive are generally characterized by data or algorithmic flaws that introduce errors or lead to incorrect outcomes. They can result in unfair or discriminatory treatment of groups of people based on ethnicity, gender, or other factors. Such models operate on a biased set of data from which they were trained, which can lead to unfair outcomes when used to make decisions that impact these groups.
For instance, facial recognition software has been shown to have a higher error rate for women and people of color, due to bias in the training data. This exemplifies how AI models are only as unbiased as the data sets they were trained on. Furthermore, these models can also suffer from deceptive or unrealistic outputs that can impact matters like information accuracy, cybersecurity, or national security.

FTC’s Guidance on AI Products

The FTC has issued guidance on AI products that require businesses deploying AI to provide transparency about the product’s operations, and to take into account the risks and negative implications it poses. The guidance focuses on ensuring that AI is designed to pursue fairness, justice, and accessibility principles, and that it is not discriminatory or biased against certain groups of people.
Despite guidelines from FTC, CAIDP alleges that OpenAI’s GPT-4 model fails to meet these standards and beliefs that it poses a risk to privacy and public safety. OpenAI has also not provided adequate transparency relating to data privacy and protection.

CAIDP’s Complaint against OpenAI and Risks of GPT-4

CAIDP’s complaint cites OpenAI’s biased and deceptive behaviour in the development, deployment, and marketing of its new language model, GPT-4. They argue that OpenAI’s failure to recognize and address these risks has led to potential privacy violations and an increased risk to public safety.
GPT-4’s use of unsupervised learning to generate text based on prompts has significant implications on cybersecurity domains such as, phishing and disinformation campaigns. Such activity is destructive and poses a threat, especially with unsupervised machine-learning systems where it is possible to devise target-specific attacks within the messaging channels.

Implications of OpenAI’s Behavior

OpenAI’s behavior on this matter raises questions regarding AI research ethics, the responsibilities that accompany technological development, privacy, and information security. This situation reflects broader policy and regulatory questions surrounding AI practices, governance, and risks associated with AI models.
Organizations must adopt uniform, transparent, and ethical standards that emphasize the responsible use of AI applications that integrate inherent safeguards and privacy protection mechanisms. The AI community must engage in research that advances technologies in a sound and responsible direction whilst infusing privacy-by-design.

Conclusion

In summary, CAIDP’s complaint is an opportunity to create transparency and accountability when it comes to deploying AI models. It is essential to pay attention to the shortcomings of the current AI regulatory system and strive to have public policy considerations that safeguard citizens’ rights concerning privacy and data protection. The current regulatory lacunae need addressing as AI models are proliferating in various domains.
Such models and resulting applications must be designed with a responsible perspective, and their impact must be closely monitored. AI’s success is a function of meeting ethical, social, and legal expectations. OpenAI and other research labs must actively engage in discussions that outline clear ethical guidelines on the development of AI models.
# FAQs
1. What is CAIDP?
CAIDP stands for Artificial Intelligence and Digital Policy Center. It is a non-profit organization that focuses on helping to shape technology policy in a way that is safe, ethical, and beneficial to democracy.
2. What is GPT-4?
GPT-4 is the latest language model developed by OpenAI. It generates human-like text based on a set of provided prompts.
3. What does the FTC Act prohibit?
Section 5 of the FTC Act prohibits unfair or deceptive business practices that can be damaging to consumers.