Article Title: Open Letter to EU Authorities Regarding the Proposed Amendment to Article 30 of the Data Law

According to reports, Rebecca Rettig, Chief Policy Officer of Polygon Labs, shared an open letter to EU authorities regarding the proposed amendment to Article 30 of the Data Law: Measures for a Fair and Innovative Data Economy, which is an important document in European technology regulation. Basically, the proposed amendment aims to exclude 100% unlicensed technology and its creators (such as open-source contributors) from the scope of data regulation.

Polygon Labs sends a letter to EU authorities proposing better DeFi regulation

Article Outline:

1. Introduction
2. Overview of the proposed amendment to Article 30 of the Data Law
3. Controversy surrounding the proposed amendment
4. Concerns raised by Rebecca Rettig in the open letter
5. The impact of the proposed amendment on innovation and competition
6. Polycon Labs’ recommendations for the proposed amendment
7. Conclusion
8. FAQs

The Article:

**Introduction**
Technology regulation is a crucial aspect of the European market, and the proposed amendment to Article 30 of the Data Law has caused a stir in the industry. With the aim of excluding 100% unlicensed technology and its creators from the scope of data regulation, this amendment has been met with resistance from various organizations. In this article, we will explore the controversy surrounding the proposed amendment and the concerns raised by Rebecca Rettig, Chief Policy Officer of Polygon Labs, in her open letter to EU authorities.
**Overview of the proposed amendment to Article 30 of the Data Law**
The proposed amendment to Article 30 of the Data Law is part of the recently proposed Measures for a Fair and Innovative Data Economy, which seeks to create a conducive environment for data-driven innovation in Europe. The amendment seeks to exclude 100% unlicensed technology and its creators from the scope of data regulation in the EU, effectively silencing open-source developers and contributors.
**Controversy surrounding the proposed amendment**
The proposal has generated controversy within the technology community, with many arguing that it is a move towards protectionism and could stifle innovation. The amendment’s critics argue that it will create an unfair playing field, giving an advantage to licensed technology providers while stifling the development of open-source solutions.
**Concerns raised by Rebecca Rettig in the open letter**
Rebecca Rettig, Chief Policy Officer of Polygon Labs, raised concerns in her open letter to EU authorities. Rettig argues that the amendment will have a detrimental impact on innovation, stifling the growth of open-source technologies and their creators. She further argues that the proposed amendment is contradictory to the European Union’s objectives and values of innovation, creativity, and competition.
**The impact of the proposed amendment on innovation and competition**
The proposed amendment could have significant implications for innovation and competition in the technology industry. By excluding 100% unlicensed technology and its creators from the scope of data regulation, the amendment could favor licensed technology providers, giving them an unfair advantage over open-source developers.
**Polycon Labs’ recommendations for the proposed amendment**
Polygon Labs has submitted recommendations for the proposed amendment, advocating for an inclusive approach that does not stifle innovation or create an unfair playing field. The company recommends that the EU consider the impact of the proposed amendment on open-source technologies and their creators, ensuring that it does not have a detrimental impact on innovation or competition.
**Conclusion**
The proposed amendment to Article 30 of the Data Law has the potential to significantly impact the technology industry, and it is critical that EU authorities consider the implications carefully. While the aim of creating a fair and innovative data economy is laudable, it is crucial to consider the impact of excluding open-source technologies and their creators from the scope of data regulation.
**FAQs**
1. What is the proposed amendment to Article 30 of the Data Law?
The proposed amendment seeks to exclude 100% unlicensed technology and its creators from the scope of data regulation in the EU, effectively silencing open-source developers and contributors.
2. Why is the proposed amendment controversial?
The proposal has generated controversy within the technology community, with many arguing that it is a move towards protectionism and could stifle innovation.
3. What are Polygon Labs’ recommendations for the proposed amendment?
Polygon Labs recommends an inclusive approach that does not stifle innovation or create an unfair playing field, advocating for the EU to consider the impact of the proposed amendment on open-source technologies and their creators.
**Keywords:**
1. Article 30 of the Data Law
2. Open-source technologies
3. Innovation and competition.